<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally Shooting in Digital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.collins.id.au/2010/04/28/finally-shooting-in-digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.collins.id.au/2010/04/28/finally-shooting-in-digital/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 02:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirtualWolf</title>
		<link>http://chris.collins.id.au/2010/04/28/finally-shooting-in-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>VirtualWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 04:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.collins.id.au/?p=110#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Woo! Excellent. :D

I can quite recommend the 35mm f/2, that&#039;s the only lens we actually have for the 7D at the moment. Sure it&#039;s a bit old and the auto-focus mechanism isn&#039;t USM so it&#039;s noisy, but I love it. The field of view (56mm equivalent) is just perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woo! Excellent. :D</p>
<p>I can quite recommend the 35mm f/2, that&#8217;s the only lens we actually have for the 7D at the moment. Sure it&#8217;s a bit old and the auto-focus mechanism isn&#8217;t USM so it&#8217;s noisy, but I love it. The field of view (56mm equivalent) is just perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://chris.collins.id.au/2010/04/28/finally-shooting-in-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.collins.id.au/?p=110#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Already was my plan, along with the 35mm prime (to counter the APS-C lens crop to get framing closer to a 50mm lens on a 35mm format).

Once I&#039;ve got those, then I&#039;ll look into a decent EF-S zoom, followed by a real EF tele.  And that&#039;s pretty much the limit of my plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already was my plan, along with the 35mm prime (to counter the APS-C lens crop to get framing closer to a 50mm lens on a 35mm format).</p>
<p>Once I&#8217;ve got those, then I&#8217;ll look into a decent EF-S zoom, followed by a real EF tele.  And that&#8217;s pretty much the limit of my plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://chris.collins.id.au/2010/04/28/finally-shooting-in-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.collins.id.au/?p=110#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Get yourself a 50mm prime. The F1.8 lenses are very cheap and ridiculously good quality. But if you can afford it, splash out on a 1.4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get yourself a 50mm prime. The F1.8 lenses are very cheap and ridiculously good quality. But if you can afford it, splash out on a 1.4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

